Corynantheidine

  • Corynantheidine, also known as 9-demethoxy mitragynine, is a secondary indole alkaloid present in Mitragyna speciosa (kratom).
  • Although detected at lower concentrations than mitragynine or 7-hydroxymitragynine, corynantheidine contributes to kratom’s pharmacological complexity through mixed opioid and non-opioid activity.
  • Analytical characterization has identified it consistently in kratom leaves and commercial extracts, with validated UPLC–MS/MS and GC–MS methods available for quantification.
  • Pharmacological investigations indicate that corynantheidine exhibits partial agonism at the µ-opioid receptor (MOR) with a binding affinity around 57 nM, while displaying comparatively higher affinity for α-adrenergic receptors, particularly α1D (Ki ≈ 41 nM).
  • Additional displacement at serotonergic receptor subtypes has been observed at micromolar concentrations, suggesting broader polypharmacology.
  • Preclinical pharmacokinetic studies in rodents report oral bioavailability of approximately 50%, a Tmax of 4.1 hours, and distribution to brain regions including the corpus callosum and hippocampus.
  • Toxicological data highlight its role as a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6 (Ki ≈ 2.8 µM) with substrate-dependent effects on CYP3A, raising concerns regarding potential drug–drug interactions.
  • While human studies remain unavailable, current evidence suggests corynantheidine may contribute to the pharmacological and toxicological profile of kratom beyond its minor quantitative presence.
  • An integrated analysis of its receptor activity, pharmacokinetics, and metabolic liabilities underscores the need for translational research to clarify its role in both therapeutic potential and safety risks.

Key Findings

  • Minor alkaloid in kratom: Corynantheidine (9-demethoxy mitragynine) occurs in low abundance in Mitragyna speciosa leaves and commercial preparations but is consistently detectable using validated LC–MS/MS assays.
  • Opioid receptor activity: Acts as a partial agonist at the µ-opioid receptor (MOR) with reported Ki ≈ 57 nM, but shows weaker or negligible activity at δ- and κ-opioid receptors.
  • Adrenergic binding preference: Displays higher affinity for α1-adrenergic receptors, especially α1D (Ki ≈ 41 nM), suggesting adrenergic modulation may contribute more strongly than opioid activity to its effects.
  • Serotonergic interactions: Demonstrates measurable displacement at multiple 5-HT receptor subtypes at micromolar concentrations, indicating possible serotonergic involvement.
  • Pharmacokinetics in rodents: Oral bioavailability of ~50%, Tmax ≈ 4.1 h, with distribution to brain regions including the corpus callosum and hippocampus, confirming central nervous system penetration.
  • Analytical validation: UPLC–MS/MS and GC–MS methods enable sensitive quantification in plasma, urine, and plant material, supporting pharmacokinetic and forensic investigations.
  • Safety and drug interactions: Potent CYP2D6 inhibitor (Ki ≈ 2.8 µM) and substrate-dependent CYP3A inhibitor, highlighting risk for drug–drug interactions with medications metabolized by these pathways.
  • Clinical gap: No human pharmacokinetic or toxicological studies exist; current evidence is restricted to in vitro and animal models, necessitating translational research before clinical conclusions can be drawn.

Introduction


  • Corynantheidine, also known as 9-demethoxy mitragynine (CAS 23407-35-4), is a minor indole alkaloid found in Mitragyna speciosa (kratom), structurally related to mitragynine but lacking the methoxy group at the C-9 position [1,2].
  • Although present at lower concentrations than mitragynine (up to ~66% of total alkaloid content) and 7-hydroxymitragynine (up to ~2%), corynantheidine is consistently detected within the minor alkaloid fraction, typically ranging 0.01–2.8% (w/w) in kratom leaves and commercial preparations [3].
  • Pharmacological studies highlight its distinct receptor binding profile, with relatively high affinity for adrenergic receptors, particularly α₁D (Ki ≈ 41.7 nM), and moderate µ-opioid receptor (MOR) binding (human MOR Ki ≈ 118 nM; mouse MOR Ki ≈ 57.1 nM), while showing weaker κ- and δ-opioid receptor binding [4–6].
  • This dual pharmacology suggests corynantheidine contributes to kratom’s overall effects through both opioid partial agonism and adrenergic modulation.
  • Potential relevance includes analgesic properties, modulation of cardiovascular tone, and drug–drug interaction (DDI) risk via metabolic pathways.
Corynantheidine Review Aims
  • Chemical identity and structural classification: Summarize its chemical identity and structural classification [7, 8].
  • Natural occurrence and abundance: Report its natural occurrence and abundance in kratom leaves/products [9].
  • Receptor pharmacology: Evaluate receptor pharmacology across opioid, adrenergic, and serotonergic targets [10, 11].
  • Pharmacokinetics and brain distribution: Review pharmacokinetics and brain distribution in preclinical models [12].
  • Analytical methods: Summarize analytical methods for quantification in biological and plant matrices [13].
  • Safety and DDI potential: Assess safety and drug–drug interaction potential via cytochrome P450 inhibition [14, 15].

Methods

  • A structured literature review was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases using the keywords “corynantheidine,” “9-demethoxy mitragynine,” “kratom alkaloids,” “receptor pharmacology,” “pharmacokinetics,” “CYP inhibition,” and “analytical methods.”
  • Articles published in English between 2000 and 2024 were considered [16].
  • Reference lists of retrieved studies were screened to identify additional relevant publications.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
  • Included: Peer-reviewed experimental studies, pharmacological profiling reports, analytical method validation papers, and systematic reviews reporting original data on corynantheidine.
  • Excluded: Non-peer-reviewed content, anecdotal reports, studies without specific data on corynantheidine, and duplicated datasets.
Data Extraction
  • Chemistry/Identifiers: CAS, PubChem CID, molecular formula, stereochemistry.
  • Occurrence: Concentrations in plant material or commercial preparations.
  • Pharmacology: Binding affinity (Ki), efficacy (Emax), receptor subtype specificity.
  • Pharmacokinetics: Cmax, Tmax, clearance, bioavailability, tissue distribution.
  • Analytical Methods: Matrix, assay platform (UPLC–MS/MS, GC–MS), linear range, LOQ, validation parameters.
  • Safety/Interactions: CYP inhibition (isoform, Ki/IC50), transporter interactions, potential drug–drug interaction predictions.
Quality Assessment
  • Use of validated assays or analytical methods.
  • Replication or independent confirmation of results.
  • Transparent reporting of sample size and assay conditions.

Results: Chemistry & Identifiers

Corynantheidine is classified as a corynanthe-type indole alkaloid, structurally related to mitragynine but lacking the methoxy group at the C-9 position. It is also referred to as rauhimbine in older pharmacognosy literature, although “corynantheidine” is the most widely used name in kratom-related research.


Natural Occurrence & Quantification of Corynantheidine

In authenticated kratom preparations and U.S. commercial products, corynantheidine ranges from ~0.02–1.16% w/w of material analyzed; examples across an alkaloid fraction, lyophilized tea, and multiple retail products are shown below [22].

In controlled cultivation experiments (field vs. greenhouse), leaf corynantheidine (mg/g dry mass) was consistently low and not significantly affected by light regime, while per-plant alkaloid yield varied with biomass; detailed per-condition values are reported in Table 1 of the study [23].

Regional surveys and chemotype work confirm substantial between-product variability in kratom alkaloid profiles (including minor alkaloids); these studies support the product-to-product spread seen for corynantheidine [24, 25].

Receptor Pharmacology

µ-opioid receptor (MOR): Corynantheidine binds MOR with Ki ≈ 118 ± 12 nM (human) and ≈ 57.1 ± 8.3 nM (mouse); it is a partial agonist in functional assays (Emax ~74% in mouse [35S]GTPγS; ~37% in hMOR BRET). [26, 27]

Adrenergic receptors: Show notably higher affinity at α1D-adrenergic (Ki = 41.7 ± 4.7 nM, human). [28]

Selected non-opioid targets: PDSP panel indicates hα2A (Ki ~74 nM) and hNMDA (Ki ~83 nM) among the higher-affinity non-opioid sites. [29]

Analytical Methods

  • Plasma (bioanalytical): FDA-guideline–validated UPLC–MS/MS assay quantified corynantheidine in rat plasma; supported PK and MSI work (accuracy, precision, selectivity, stability reported). [30]
  • Products & plant material: Validated UPLC–MS/MS method quantified 10 key kratom alkaloids (incl. corynantheidine) across leaf extracts and commercial products for QC/standardization. [31]
  • Expanded panels / HRMS: UPLC-HRMS quantified 14 alkaloids (indole + oxindole) in US-grown plants/products, illustrating chemotype variability. [32]
  • Legacy urine screening: GC–MS full-scan procedures monitor kratom intake in urine (mainly mitragynine); minor alkaloids like corynantheidine may be under-represented. [33]
  • Method landscape: Reviews summarize HPLC/UPLC-MS, HRMS, GC–MS platforms, matrices, and pitfalls (e.g., stability, stereoisomer resolution), including single-alkaloid PK assays. [34]

Safety & Drug–Drug Interactions

CYP2D6: Corynantheidine is a competitive CYP2D6 inhibitor (IC₅₀ ≈ 4.2 µM; Kᵢ ≈ 2.8 µM) in human liver microsomes → plausible interaction with CYP2D6 substrates (antidepressants, beta-blockers, certain opioids). [35]

CYP3A (probe-dependent): Inhibition seen with midazolam 1′-hydroxylase but not testosterone 6β-hydroxylase → substrate-dependent CYP3A signal; avoid over-generalizing across all CYP3A drugs. [36]

Translational context: PBPK/static modeling with kratom alkaloids shows clinically meaningful DDI potential with CYP3A substrates (demonstrated for mitragynine–midazolam; corynantheidine likely contributes additively). Human data for corynantheidine specifically are absent. [37, 38]

Transporters: P-gp inhibition reported for mitragynine in vitro; no direct transporter data for corynantheidine → unknown contribution to efflux-mediated DDIs. [39]

Practical implication: If corynantheidine-containing products are co-used with CYP2D6 or CYP3A substrates (especially narrow-therapeutic-index drugs), DDI risk exists. Clinical evidence for corynantheidine is lacking, so decisions should default to caution pending human studies. [40]

Discussion

Corynantheidine is a minor but pharmacologically relevant kratom indole alkaloid. Its mixed target profile—partial MOR agonism alongside higher-affinity α1D-adrenergic binding—supports dual opioid/adrenergic mechanisms at sub-micromolar levels [41]. Preclinical PK shows moderate oral bioavailability (~50%), Tmax ~4 h, and brain exposure by MSI, indicating CNS-relevant concentrations under studied dosing conditions [42]. Across leaves and products, quantity varies widely (≈0.02–1.16% w/w in a representative dataset), consistent with known chemotype and product variability [43]. In DDI risk, corynantheidine is a CYP2D6 inhibitor (Ki ~2.8 µM) and shows probe-dependent CYP3A inhibition, warranting caution with narrow-therapeutic-index substrates pending human data [44]. Overall, the most critical data gaps are human PK, dose–exposure–effect relationships, and clinical DDI studies; these are needed to translate preclinical findings to real-world safety and efficacy [45].

References

  1. Cayman Chemical – Corynantheidine reference standard
  2. WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence – Kratom review (PDF)
  3. León et al., 2021 (Front Pharmacol; receptor profiling)
  4. Obeng et al., 2020 (Drug Metab Rev; receptor/enzyme interactions)
  5. Cayman Chemical – Opioid receptor binding data
  6. PubChem – Corynantheidine (CID 10566)
  7. NCATS Inxight Drugs – Corynantheidine
  8. Sharma et al., 2019 (J Pharm Biomed Anal; quant)
  9. León et al., 2021 (Front Pharmacol)
  10. Obeng et al., 2020 (Drug Metab Rev)
  11. King et al., 2020 (PK/MSI; full text)
  12. Kamble et al., 2020 (J Chromatogr B; LC–MS/MS assay)
  13. Kamble et al., 2019 (Toxicol Lett; CYP2D6/CYP3A)
  14. Todd et al., 2020 (Biopharm Drug Dispos)
  15. PubMed – database portal
  16. CAS Common Chemistry – 23407-35-4
  17. Precision FDA – UNII QMP2RF3L41
  18. NCATS Inxight Drugs – same UNII record
  19. PubChem – Corynantheidine (CID 3000341)
  20. ChemSpider – Corynantheidine (ID 2271987)
  21. Sharma et al., 2019 (Drug Test Anal; open access)
  22. Zhang et al., 2022 (PLOS ONE; cultivation/leaf mg·g⁻¹)
  23. Chear et al., 2021 (J Nat Prod; Malaysian leaves)
  24. Manwill et al., 2022 (Planta Med; UPLC-HRMS)
  25. Obeng et al., 2019 (J Med Chem; α1D & MOR Kᵢ)
  26. Chakraborty et al., 2021 (ACS Chem Neurosci; mouse MOR, hMOR BRET, PDSP)
  27. Váradi et al., 2016 (J Med Chem; pseudoindoxyl SAR)
  28. King et al., 2020 (PubMed record for PK)
  29. Kamble et al., 2021 (J Nat Prod; oral products PK in rats)
  30. Tanna et al., 2024/2023 (DMD; translational PK/DDI pdf)
  31. King et al., 2020 (PK paper; also methods)
  32. Sharma et al., 2019 (Drug Test Anal; methods)
  33. Manwill et al., 2022 (Planta Med; methods)
  34. (GC–MS urine screen; legacy)
  35. Citti, 2023 (review PDF)
  36. Kamble et al., 2019 (CYP inhibition)
  37. Tanna et al., 2021 (CPT: PSP; PBPK/static modeling)
  38. Tanna & Paine, 2023 (DMD review)
  39. Obeng et al., 2019 (J Med Chem; receptor panel)
  40. Chakraborty et al., 2021 (ACS Chem Neurosci)
  41. King et al., 2020 (PK/MSI)
  42. Sharma et al., 2019 (quant, % w/w)
  43. Kamble et al., 2019 (CYP2D6 Kᵢ ≈ 2.8 µM)
  44. Tanna & Paine, 2023 (human data gaps))